About
ten years ago, for my Word Gems collection, I posted
numerous quotations from history’s notables on the subject of
thinking. Assertions, such as this one by Shaw, made no sense to me,
and I wondered about what he was getting at. I’m starting to
understand.
One of
the best teachers I’ve discovered on this subject is Eckhart Tolle.
It was he who helped me to see that much of what we call thinking is
merely the chattering Ego, the Great False Self, aggrandizing,
perpetuating, power-posturing, itself. The Ego loves to endlessly
replay the horror movies of the past (“I will never forget or
forgive what he or she did to me!”); or, of the future (“I can’t
wait for such-and-such to happen, and then I will be
happy”).
-
Eckhart Tolle: “I would say about 80 to 90 percent of most people's
thinking is not only repetitive and useless, but because of its
dysfunctional and often negative nature, much of it is also
harmful.”
That which commonly passes for thinking
is merely the Ego seeking its own narrow objectives; rich
or poor; educated or illiterate; religious or atheistic; culturally
sophisticated or red-neck, it makes no difference… The great masses
are led around by what Tolle refers to as the autocratic and
domineering Ego.
The
editorial comments of Camille Paglia often make me smile. Notice, in
her assessment of partisan politics, the many untoward designs of
the self-absorbed Ego…
Political ideologues "automatically believe everything party leaders
tell them. Why? Is it because the new professional class is a glossy
product of generically institutionalized
learning? Independent thought and logical analysis of
argument are no longer taught. Elite education in the U.S. has
become a frenetic assembly line of
competitive college application to schools where ideological brainwashing is so pandemic that
it's invisible. The top schools, from the Ivy League on down,
promote ‘critical thinking,’ which sounds good but is, in fact, just
a style of rote regurgitation of hackneyed
approved terms
... The [politically-correct] brain has been marinating so long in
those clichés that it's positively pickled.”
Believing your own propaganda
Camille is right -
however, these things apply not only to those involved in politics. Many of us, too many, do not consider… we
just react… we defend tired propositions… many of which were
mindlessly accepted from parents and never subjected to the critical light of day…
and the Ego defends these thread-bare propositions…
because it has identified, closely linked itself, with
them; which means, when we say we are defending an idea,
we are really defending … ourselves … and,
therefore, winning an argument sometimes becomes a matter of very
survival… to the Ego… which has attached itself to these mental
thought-forms.
What should thinking be?
-
Gerald Holton, Einstein,
History, and Other Passions: "In the final
chapter entitled What, Precisely, is Thinking? ...
Einstein's answer is particularly insightful ... ‘One must allow
the theoretician his imagination, for there is no other possible
way for reaching the goal. In any case, it is not an aimless
imagination but a search for the logically simplest
possibilities and their consequences' … Einstein continued to ask questions about the world
that children are taught not to ask.”
But
most people do not have “questions.”
They
do not “search.”
And if
the Ego searches at all, it will be only to seek further
entrenchment within, and support for, its thought-identified
positions.
Thinking, for most people, is a tawdry process of
shooting an arrow into a wall and then drawing a bulls-eye around
the point!
We
search for confirmation of our parochial views, block out what we
don’t like, and then call this “research.” We go shopping for
Ph.D.’s who are sympathetic to our position, reject those who
disagree, and pontificate that “experts tell us.” This kind of
so-called thinking, as William James warned, is merely the
rearranging of prejudices of the Ego.
The
average person – even if confronted with compelling evidence to the
contrary - has no intention of ever analyzing, reviewing, and moving
beyond, “what Daddy said”; or “what Grandma said”; or “what College
Professor said”; or “what Dear Political Leader said”; or “what
Exalted Religious Teacher said.”
• Albert Einstein: “Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest
enemy of truth.”
How
far removed! How different! as we witnessed earlier, was the
intellectual curiosity, and integrity of Niels Bohr, who withheld
obeisance, and would not offer a popular and conventional answer,
even though his diploma stood in jeopardy!
Do
you think it was by accident… not only that Bohr won a Nobel Prize,
but… that he became a developer of one of history’s strangest, most
other-worldly, most so not-common-sense, theories ever to be posited
by any scientist of history?!
Allow
me to offer a hint - he didn’t get there simply by memorizing his
lessons!
Do you
think that you could win a Nobel Prize?
Why
not?
Maybe
you could.
Why do
you think not?
Do you
not have a brain as these others? How do you know that twenty years
of creatively-applied skillful thinking might not yield your own
stellar results?
The
high-level achievers of history usually do not speak of “genius.”
They speak of hard work, over long periods of time.
Thinking, as Einstein defines it, is meant to be a
creative process, a diligent methodical “search” and no mere
"aimless imagination"!
But
before you can search, you’ll need, as he advises, some
“questions.”
And
before the questions, you’ll do better if you understand what Dr.
Adler spoke of as “the ABCs,” the building blocks, of
thought.
Thinking, of course, is important for all human beings -
but if you aspire to become a writer, or a speaker, one
who will have something worthwhile to say, you, especially, will
need to discover what thinking really means!