Home | What's New | Other Sites | Email | About CharisCorp

 

Word Gems
What is a man but the sum of his thoughts?


Mark Twain's
Huckleberry Finn

Editor's Essay

Two on a Raft:
Exploring Currents of Evil in Huck Finn

  • Editor's note: this essay was originally written as part of a Master's Degree program.

 

Two on a Raft: Exploring Currents of Evil in Huck Finn

     It’s been said, “Back East, they try to fool you by saying more than they know; and out West, they try to fool you by saying less than they know.” But this proverb must now be appended, an attachment forced upon us by Twain: “In the South, they try to fool you with cornpone humor and good-old-boy talk.” The author’s comic-relief lines such as “What’re you alassin’ about,” “Dog my cats,” and “preforeordestination” distract the unwary and belie Twain’s essential preoccupation, a deep and somber undercurrent of unease regarding the antebellum world of racial violence, bigotry, and social injustice – the face of evil in the land of hominy grits and “well-l-l, shut ma mouth.”

     Though Huckleberry Finn would be published twenty years after the official end of slavery, Twain well understood that the sensitive issues he dared to broach in his now-revered work continued as open wounds upon the psyches of many Americans. Doubtless, Twain, “the quintessential American writer” (Emerson 682), sensed that his message -- if he were to be successful in reaching many of his post-Civil War audience -- would require a full measure of his gifts of rhetoric. Facets of these considerable powers of persuasion – his keenly-phrased humor, affable story-telling ability, and studied, easy-going persona – are all reflected in this important literary work; a book, on one level, even young children will find entertaining; and seasoned readers, too, in the midst of all the “premature balditude” banter, will find themselves engrossed, staring at difficult and weighty issues of life: the shadow of Darkness in the hearts of folk who, paradoxically, had become famously synonymous for warm hospitality.

     As we wade into the opening scenes and chapters, something odd begins to strike us: no one, not one single character, makes a dad-burned lick a’ sense in anything that he or she says. All of these spirits live in a murky world of superstition, of hard-fisted religious dogmatism, of unfounded presumption and ill-conceived certitude. These are people who are sure! and they will brashly lecture any galoot on matters into which angels would fear to tread. Huck, schooled in this unforgiving environment, is wise beyond his young years, but only in street smarts. He, like the others around him, speaks of a reality with sharp edges and dank, cold walls, one further explored in the following terms.

     Hypocrisy. The Widow Douglas disdains Huck’s tobacco habits, yet thinks it not unusual to permit herself the same indulgence: “that was alright because she done it herself.” Children are sternly commanded to be proper, upright, and “never think about [your]self.” Fine words but, as the British say, fine words butter no parsnips – words set against the backdrop of ultimate self-absorption and ego-centricity, the justification of the enslavement of one group by another.

     God. The Almighty, we learn by inference, is a respectable Southern Gentleman. No one sees anything out-of-place in the picture of fetching “the niggers in” to have “prayers.” This kind of cognitive-disconnect causes children to surmise the existence of “two Providences,” one whose purposes “make a body’s mouth water,” and the other, the kind of god you don’t much care to be around. Huck, at one point, thinks he may opt for the rewards of the first deity – “if he wanted me.” The gods of Twain’s universe, like their subservient mortals below, are capricious, self-serving. Theologian Marcus Borg of Oregon State University, in his The God We Never Knew, suggests that our mental picture of God -- what we imagine him to be like -- affects the subsequent flow of all our theology and personal activity. It becomes clear rather quickly in Huck Finn that the God proper Southern people worship is, essentially, a Cosmic Slave Master, one dealing with his people according to private whim and good pleasure – so why should his elect not treat others in like manner? The words of preachers, representatives of this disengaged and aloof deity, become “tears and flapdoodle,” “rot and slush.” Happiness is defined as feeling good – “as good as church letting out.”

     Superstition. We see individuals turning around in their “tracks three times” and crossing their breasts; locks of hair are pressed into service to keep witches at bay; coins are revered due to their once-proximity to dark spirits. Strangely, one senses little difference between the way they view all of this and their so-called Christian religion.

     Illiteracy and ignorance. The masses in this world are, at best, functionally illiterate. And those rare few who develop the skills of the wordsmith, like rapacious beasts, prey upon the unlettered disadvantaged. Most words are viewed as foreign objects – runic, awful, and indecipherable, as if they had fallen from Mars: “I’ve seen it in books so, of course, that’s what we’ve got to do.” The word ransomed, a word unknown to Huck and his friends, becomes a kind of psychologist’s inkblot test, and those who attempt to plumb its depths reveal nothing about the term itself and everything about their own darkened hearts. Precisely divining the nature of the universe itself is also a task not too daunting for these overreaching spirits: “Jim said the moon could a’ laid them; well that looked kind of reasonable [. . .] because I’ve seen a frog lay most as many.” So ignorant are these unfortunates that, at times, they fail to understand even when they’ve been insulted: “‘[I am] degraded to the companionship of felons on a raft.’ Jim pitied him ever so much and so did I.” We find these hapless ones too accommodating, too polite, in some instances -- but not too shy to enslave certain other human beings.

     Enfants terrible. The children of this Dark World express pathological interests -- none of these kids yearn to grow up to be a doctor, policeman, or fireman. Instead, they pretend to be highwaymen – and while it may not be uncommon even for healthy youngsters to play a pirate’s role, the children-at-play in this Dark World go too far. There is something unsettling to hear a child exclaim, even in make-believe jest, “We [. . .] kill the people and take their watches and money.” Even more unnerving is to witness hate-filled teenagers, carefully instructed in their parents’ blood sports, cutting each other down as easy as sweet-potato pie: “Why, where was you raised? Don’t you know what a feud is?”

     Lying. Always present among any people, prevarication is taken, here, not sparingly like wine, but in gulps like water. Each lie, and series of lies, creates an alternate truth, and one quickly feels overwhelmed in trying to sort out the overlapping realities; indeed, an occupational hazard of all this can result in forgetting one’s own name. Yet the participants, one senses, think it all to be quite normal and the natural way to negotiate the vicissitudes of life: “that kind of humbug talky-talk, just the way people always does at a supper, you know.” At one point, one of the most disturbing incidents in the novel, Huck spins a convoluted yarn to trick Jim -- just for sport, just for the sheer cussedness of it.

     Devaluation of the human spirit. Those of Huck’s world think it grand fun to put “turpentine on a stray dog and setting fire to him,” or just plain ol’ “tying a tin pan to his tail and see him run himself to death.” Good stuff on a Saturday night, eh? But what these sad pranksters miss is that their mindless cruelty to animals, the weakest and most innocent of entities, becomes the measure of their conduct toward the disadvantaged and helpless in the human kingdom. It is a small step from this injustice to viewing all creatures as mere pawns in one’s own private chess game. Kenneth Clark, in his Civilisation, remarks that artists during the early European Dark Ages conceived of humankind as beings intrinsically unworthy – and such perception was reflected in how men and women were depicted in art. This devaluation of the human essence also found expression in the South’s new Dark Age. Life was cheap; human flesh was nothing more than another commodity, like lumber or salt. One of the Wilks’ girls, in Huck’s eyes, has no name and is only “the harelip,” a personal evaluation and statement of worth. And Jim, suffering under poorly defined self-image, in a comment laced with the existential, exclaims, “Is I me, or who is I [. . .] I is, is I?”

     The measure of a man. In what might be the novel’s funniest scene, the drunken Boggs, like Warner Brothers’ Yosemite Sam on a rampage, gallops and careens into town where “[e]verybody yelled at him and laughed at him and sassed him, and he sassed back, and said he’d attend to them and lay them out in their regular turns, but he couldn’t wait now because he’d come to town to kill Col. Sherburn, and his motto was, Meat first and spoon vittles to top off on.” This is so incredibly hilarious, some of Twain’s best, I think. But the audience’s mirth, here, is quickly dampened when Sherburn guns down in cold-blood the sottish and pleading-for-mercy Boggs. Then, almost worse, the pathetic Sherburn tries to convince all of us that he is, in fact, a real man and a real hero – the quintessential man of the South; unfortunately, for his day, he seems to be correct.

     Huck Finn is a book that tells a story of the Darkness of America's Darkest Age. The people of Huck's world, generally, would have defined darkness as the absence of white – this becomes clear, I think, in the above examples; but, far from their definition, the true essence of darkness and evil reveal itself in Twain’s work as the absence of light – the light of reason; of human kindness; of empathy and good will.

     Jim, not Huck, gradually emerges as the book’s central character in terms of the author’s message. Throughout much of the story, we see Huck saving Jim – but, in the end, these roles are reversed. Jim, we witness, has not only endured the evils inflicted upon him but has risen above them. One of Michelangelo’s sculptures depicts what appears to be a half-formed man attempting to tear himself out of sheer rock: the artist seems to emphasize a process of Man forming himself – Jim is like that. He is transformed before our eyes. He is introduced to us as one similar in nature to any of those around him, but later we note his evolving magnanimous spirit when slighted; his profession of true friendship and special terms of endearment for Huck; his selflessness in small matters, taking an extra watch on the raft and never breathing a word of it.

     Jim, ostensibly, represents the South’s spirit-stunted idea of the off-scouring of the earth, a complete non-entity: “'Good gracious! anybody hurt?' 'No’m. Killed a nigger'” -- this kind of testimony is painful to read. But by tale’s end, we begin to deeply admire Jim. Some claim that Twain, by his portrayal of "nigger" Jim, is guilty of “racism” (Person B10) and “moral passivity in response to slavery” (Charles B1). This is most unfortunate – literary critics who cannot read!

     Far from disrespecting Jim, Twain means for us to be drawn to Jim, even, to be saved by him! We love him because he first loved us. This phrase, of course, is biblical in origin – and it is Twain’s intention, which becomes increasingly clear near the end of the book, that we should draw such an inference: Jim sacrifices his freedom for Tom’s sake and does so after a supplicant’s quiet appeal, a prayer, for help; Christlike, Jim is silent during his mockings and cruel treatment; Jim is released and is glorified – resurrected from his death; a prophesy made by Jim comes to pass; he exhibits a kind of power over death by revealing the fate of Huck’s father. However, Twain’s most obvious allusion to Christ, without a doubt, is expressed by the dauphin-king of con who plays the part of Judas-as-betrayer and sells Jim for forty dollars!

     There’s nothing quite like a raft on a great river, Huck wants us to know – the sheer, almost wild, sense of personal sovereignty; of gentle ordered harmony; of clearer perspective; of participation in a cosmic order, borne witness to by the grand starry skies above -- all of which create a sense of careless intoxicating human dignity.

     What is Twain really telling us with this picture? On the river, unlike the nearby land of Darkness, there is peace. The force, the power, of the undercurrent sweeping us along easily directs us to the metaphysical, the true underlying nature of things. The God of the River, however, requires no religion, only spirituality and true expressions of the heart. But, just a half-mile away on shore resides Darkness: forms and shadows, ostentation and hypocrisy, rules and laws for those without the heart to obey -- all manner of evil, even a kind, so demonically cavalier, that, for a mere question regarding the time of day or name of town, one might kill you as easily as look at you. For Huck and Jim, the Mighty Mississippi is separate from all of that and becomes Twain's metaphor of a New World of social harmony and true spirituality.

     As we have seen, evil has many faces – but, I think we can also say, it has but one spirit. Twain sees this dark spirit of his society as one of hubristic presumption and ego-centric despising; of self-blinding and self-delusion; of hard-heartedness and callous manipulation. This is the hard rock out of which Jim, a kind of savior, alone in his efforts, begins to tear himself. And this is why we begin to admire him, why Huck begins to love him, by which process Huck is saved by Jim. And Huck Finn, of course, becomes Twain's attempt to save his society, and all of us, from the Darkness.

     Twain, with humor, folksy story-telling and subtle chiding, leads his 19th-century countrymen into the radical enlightenment that black slaves are, in fact, human beings: "When I waked up just at daybreak [Jim] was sitting there with his head down betwixt his knees, moaning and mourning to himself [. . .] He was thinking about his wife and his children. [. . .] I do believe he cared just as much for his people as white folks does for their'n. It don't seem natural, but I reckon it's so." Yes, it didn't "seem natural" to many of Twain's day that this could be the case -- that a black man could grieve for his absent wife and children; that a black man was "as white folks." Huck's epiphany becomes Twain's hope for every member of white society.

     Jim, the slave-man, is first introduced to us as one in bonds – but, as our eyes grow accustomed to the Light, we suddenly find that Jim, alone, is the unfettered one, the only free Man standing before us.

 

Works Cited

Charles, Ron. “Challenging Mark Twain’s Tales of Simpler Times.” Christian Science Monitor 26 Mar 1998: B1.
 
Emerson, Everett. “Huck Finn as Idol and Target.” American Literature 70.3 (1998): 682-683.

Person, James E. “Was Mark Twain a Racist?” Washington Times 13 Sept 1998: B10.

 



Top

Home | What's New | Other Sites | Email | About CharisCorp
Copyright Notice and Disclaimer

Please tell your friends about this web site.